← All Concepts
Cognitive Bias

Confirmation Bias

You don't find the truth — you find what you're looking for.

Interactive Demo

Click “Search” and watch which evidence your brain highlights first.

Confirming Evidence

Study shows vaccines are safe (CDC, 2023)
Millions vaccinated without issue
Decades of safety research confirms efficacy
WHO recommends vaccination globally

Disconfirming Evidence

Some individuals report side effects
Long-term studies still ongoing for newest vaccines
Rare adverse reactions documented in medical literature
Individual responses vary by genetics

The Psychology

Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms or supports your pre-existing beliefs. It is one of the most pervasive and well-documented cognitive biases in psychology, affecting everything from casual opinions to scientific research and judicial decisions.

The concept was dramatically demonstrated by Peter Wason in his famous 2-4-6 task in 1960. Participants were told that the sequence "2, 4, 6" followed a rule, and they had to figure out what that rule was by proposing their own sequences. Most people hypothesized "ascending even numbers" and only tested sequences that confirmed this guess (like 8, 10, 12). Very few tried sequences that might disconfirm their hypothesis (like 1, 3, 5). The actual rule was simply "any ascending numbers" — but people's tendency to seek confirming evidence prevented them from discovering this.

In the modern world, social media algorithms have supercharged confirmation bias. Platforms show you content similar to what you have already engaged with, creating echo chambers where your existing beliefs are constantly reinforced. News feeds become mirrors reflecting your worldview back at you, making it progressively harder to encounter — let alone seriously consider — contradicting perspectives. Studies have shown that even when people are presented with balanced evidence on a controversial topic, they tend to rate the evidence supporting their prior view as more convincing and the opposing evidence as flawed.

Real-World Examples

In hiring decisions, interviewers who form an early positive impression of a candidate tend to ask questions designed to confirm that impression, overlooking red flags. In news consumption, people gravitate toward outlets that align with their political views, and rate identical news stories as more credible when they come from a preferred source.

Based on Peter Wason's research (1960): On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task

Try it yourself in Bias Busters